@senyan , Sevi

thank you for your feed back.

@ Sourabh, Aanchal Sinha
Thank you very much for your comments here in support of the cause. Even yesterday, there was a car burnt case (car belongs to Indian and thousands of Indian students marched on Sydney roads..)

@Swati
like i said above, is it those thousands of students who were marching on Melbourne and Sydney roads are wrong? or one Individual called Akash Arora? You can post your comments without any word limit but the comments are being moderated. Thank you for your views and i'll give a detailed reply to you about Delhi Metros in a few moments.

@Swathi
this is one of the responses given by us to the comments on this post at a discussion forum.. hope few of the lines here will give answers to some of your points.. thank you ..

You Don't need to know "how a Naga looks, or how a Manipuri looks?" as long as you are not going to kill them on the roads due to hatred. If you are killing someone, then you should know whom you are killing, whom you are punishing.. But not killing a Sikh thinking that a Muslim..

Anything we talk here reflects to the respective guys who are responsible.. It is a general statement, It doesn't mean that all the Americans doesn't know the difference between a Sikh and Muslim, and it doesn't mean that all the Australians are absolute racists.

This is just voicing out against those who are doing this (whatever country they are from) in support of my fellow victims whom i consider as my brothers and sisters.. But here, there are many statements people wrote against Indians (in this post itself), some said "Indians can't speak English, and some said some other thing". I am not asking for a helping hand from my fellow Indians to offer your voice along with me to reply those lines..
but unfortunately we don't object those lies, those false statements, but like in a "CRAB STORY", we pull the legs among ourselves giving a feast of entertainment to others..

"the world doesn't revolve around India.." If you are not in India, thank god you are not in India, it is better to not to have gentlemen like you in my country..

One last sentence, to whoever trying to give a lecture here by saying "Correcting ourselves, Cleaning our Backyard" .. Every Individual, Every family, Every Country have those problems. No One is exception.. those who are lecturing here, my question to all of you..
"you and your brother are fighting in your house or arguing each other, then your neighbor came with a knife to kill you, what will you expect from your brother? Give a gun to the neighbor, or tell the neighbor that ''we are fighting each other now, can you go and kill my youngest brother sleeping inside?''

Is this what you all meant by "CLEANING OUR OWN BACKYARD??"

SHOW ME A COUNTRY WHICH DOESN'T NEED CLEANING?
SHOW ME A FAMILY WHICH DOESN'T NEED TO LOOK BACK AT ITSELF?
SHOW ME AN INDIVIDUAL WHO DOESN'T NEED TO LOOK INTO HIS PAST?

NOBODY IS PERFECT, BUT WHEN IT COMES SOMETHING BETWEEN YOUR COUNTRY AND OTHER COUNTRY, OR BETWEEN YOUR FELLOW CITIZEN AND A FOREIGNER, TRY TO SUPPORT YOUR COUNTRY, OR YOUR FELLOW CITIZEN AS LONG AS THE CAUSE NEEDS ATTENTION.

I WOULDN'T BE SAYING THESE WORDS IF MY FELLOW CITIZEN IS A TERRORIST WHO PUT A BOMB IN AUSTRALIA/UK/US, AND FOR THAT SOMEONE KILLED HIM.. WE ARE ONLY TRYING TO HIGHLIGHT THE ATTACKS ON VERY VERY COMMON PEOPLE WHO DON'T DESERVE IT..

when 5 attacks happened against Indians in Australia in a period of 30days, there is nothing wrong to highlight it to the responsible authorities about the seriousness of the problem.. If thousands didn't march on the roads of Melbourne, If the print and online media didn't focus or address the problem internationally, i bet that there will not be any special force introduced to stop those attacks.. If we all keep quiet, 5 more attacks might have been recorded by now.. we did peacefully and we expressed our feelings on the facts.. there is nothing that we said something that it didn't happen against Indians.. Of course, there is a bit of more sarcasm towards the end of the post, but no one need to shrug their shoulders as long as they know the difference between a Sikh and Muslim, and no one need to bother about those lines as long as they are not going to kill a Sikh on the road thinking that he is a Muslim..

@Swathi

People here worry so much if we use "RACIST" term so liberally, but the same people not at all worried, bothered, concerned if only people of one certain country were being attacked repeatedly..

Then why can't we use the word? If they have so concern about being called as a "RACIST", then they must take necessary steps by doing which they won't be branded again with the term "RACIST"..

But unfortunately, they will never realize that they are not looking at the cause "WHY?" they are being called with that term, but they are only concerned about "WHAT?" others are saying to them..

The day they can start thinking "WHY?" instead of "WHAT?" things will be better, until then they are "RACISTS", because "WHAT?" we say comes only after "WHY?" certain things happened repeatedly..

@Swathi

If there was a fight between a Hindu and a Muslim, and due that few hindus and few Muslims fought in India ( of course a hindu's brothers, sisters and relatives will be hindus mostly.. and these are the people will come in support of him if he has problems, and the same reasoning applicable for a muslim)..

So, when they fought over, how come the western media can so liberally use a word called "COMMUNAL RIOTS IN INDIA" ??? why can't the media can think that this is a fight between few people or few individuals, It is not a fight of two religions ??

If they can use the word "COMMUNAL RIOTS IN INDIA !!" so liberally, now why they can not accept if we use the word "RACIST ??"

It is not just media, it is applicable for whoever can use the term "COMMUNAL" about India or anywhere in the world, this "RACIST" is not so different in the way it can be used..

@Nisha2007

Any kind of violence is not of my interest unless it is some action movie that i am watching..

Deaths of foreigners in India, there are.. but every case is separate and there is no one common motive behind it, one on a lady for physical pleasure and one due to the differences in the very high posh cultured group, etc., like this.. i couldn't see a common ground that we in India attack US citizens if possible, or UK citizens if possible or Pakistani's if possible..
Did you find any common hatred like because of white skin or because of Christianity or Jewish or Islamic foreigner? i don't think so we have that problem in India..

But what was going on for the last 1 month in Australia is simple and clearly visible.. "IF YOU ARE AN INDIAN, THERE IS A CHANCE THAT YOU WILL BE ATTACKED SEVERELY" .. This is what i am talking about.. Why Indian?

though I don't condemn him for supporting his country, it is my responsibility to bring in front  some facts..

"THEIR IGNORANCE TO ACCEPT THE FACTS ABOUT THEIR COUNTRY WILL FURTHER MORE RUIN THEIR IMAGE IN THE VIEW OF OUT SIDE WORLD" that is all I can tell.. all the facts that referred below are not said by an Indian or an Asian, those things are said by their own people (or) whites (or) western/ Europeans whom they consider as brothers.. READ EVERY SINGLE WORD TO KNOW SOME TRUTHS ABOUT AUSTRALIA WHICH YOU MIGHT NOT BE KNOWING EARLIER"

"Socially untouchable" means 'Socially not acceptable" ::  Do they accept if I say "Al-Qaeda" Members are also children of GOD? Do they sleep with  "Osama Bin Laden" in the same house saying that he too is a son of GOD?
it all depends on how we take the meaning of the word..

Lebanese Gang and Mixed Asian/Arab?   first time I am listening to this.. Please show us some evidence.. this is nothing but throwing back the stone on to the victims.. why only for the last 30 days Lebanese gangs want  iPods and that too only iPods being used by Indians? isn't it funny? then what about around 1500 assaults on the Indians in 2007-08? all are by Lebanese/Arab? Doesn't this look like throwing mud on Muslim Community?

Racism and anti immigration always rears its head in bad economic times: It shows that they don't have a solid stance on a particular matter. It shows their opportunism, do and talk according to their convenience.. If 1500 assaults on Indians and the recent 30 days attacks on Indians are policing problems? Then do we need to understand that Australian Police slept in the year 2006 or something and didn't wake up till date? (or) do we need to understand that the police too racists, so.. just closing their eyes like nothing happened even though they know what exactly is going on?

if there is no "Social Untouchables" in their dictionary, then why do they have "Stolen Generations? (you can find this in the above post.. a must read, written by australian)" why do they have "WHITE AUSTRALIAN POLICY?" ,  why their country's leaders spoke the following? why their Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said SORRY in 2008?

Discrimination on the basis of race or ethnicity was legally sanctioned until 1975. Australia's new official policy on racial diversity is: "to build on our success as a culturally diverse, accepting and open society, united through a shared future".[17] The White Australia Policy continues to be mentioned in modern contexts, although few politicians ever mention the policy, except when denouncing their opposition. As Leader of the Opposition, John Howard, argued for restricting Asian immigration in 1988, as part of his One Australia policy, later admitting that his comments cost him his job at the time:

“ I'm not in favour of going back to a White Australia policy. I do believe that if it is -- in the eyes of some in the community -- that it's too great, it would be in our immediate-term interest and supporting of social cohesion if it (Asian immigration) were slowed down a little, so the capacity of the community to absorb it was greater.[18] ”
—John Howard speaking on ABC Radio PM, 1 August, 1988


At its peak, Pauline Hanson's One Nation party received 9% of the national election vote.[19] Pauline Hanson was widely accused of trying to take Australia back to the days of the White Australia Policy, particularly through reference to Arthur Calwell, one of the policy's strongest supporters:

“ I and most Australians want our immigration policy radically reviewed and that of multiculturalism abolished. I believe we are in danger of being swamped by Asians. Between 1984 and 1995, 40 per cent of all migrants coming into this country were of Asian origin. They have their own culture and religion, form ghettos and do not assimilate.[20] ”
—Pauline Hanson in her maiden speech to parliament


On 24 May 2007, Pauline Hanson, with her new Pauline's United Australia Party, continues her call for a freeze on immigration and provided comments about African migrants carrying disease into Australia[21]. Topics related to racism and immigration in Australia are still regularly connected by the media to the White Australia Policy. Some examples of issues and events where this connection has been made include: reconciliation with Aborigines; mandatory detention and the "Pacific Solution"; the 2005 Cronulla riots, and the 2009 attacks on Indians in Australia. Former opposition Labor party leader Mark Latham, in his book The Latham Diaries, described the ANZUS alliance as a legacy of the White Australia policy.

In 2007, the Howard Government introduced a citizenship test to include a tougher English language test, and a test on "Australian" values. The actual questions of such citizenship test have not been publicly released, and its future is in question given the ALP victory in the 2007 election.

************************************************************************************************************************

Racism in Australia
In 1987, a sensational “discovery” was made by a Sydney University team, led by Australia’s most celebrated pre-historian, Professor D J Mulvaney. They reported that the Australian population in 1788 was 750,000, or three times the previous estimate. They concluded that more than 600,000 people had died as result of white settlement.

— John Pilger, Cathy Freeman’s broad Olympic smile is being used to conceal a multitude of Australia’s original sins, July 10, 2000

In June 1998, One Nation, an Australian nationalist party in Queensland won 25 percent of the votes with their main lines at fighting immigration by non-whites. This was made possible where unemployment was been high and where it was easy to convince the people that immigrants were taking their jobs, as it would serve to be a convenient excuse and avenue to vent frustration. In a speech the party leader said that Australia was “in danger of being swamped” by Asians and she also questioned the special welfare benefits for Australia’s Aborigines. The reaction to that meant the same party won only 6 percent of the votes two months later, in the State elections.

Australia has also had a very racist past in which apartheid has been practiced and where indigenous Aboriginal people have lost almost all their land and suffered many prejudices. In the past, the notorious policy that led to the Stolen Generation was practiced. This was the institutionalized attempt to prevent Aboriginal children (and thus future generations) from being socialized into Aboriginal culture. (This also ocurred in various parts of the Americas too.)

Aborigines are the poorest group in Australia and suffer from very much preventable diseases. For more about these issues, you can start at these harrowing reports from John Pilger a prominent Australian journalist who has been critical of many western policies.

The Sydney 2000 Olympics also brought some of Australia’s racist past and present to the fore. (On the positive side, many parts of Australia’s rich diversity in people is slowly helping relieve prejudism. However, some more traditional and conservative politicians are still openly racist.)

**********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

references:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Racism_in_Australia  

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Australia_policy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_Australia

en.wikipedia.org/.../2009_attacks_on_Indian_students_in_Australia